Thursday 30 June 2016

Soch Nayi Serials



                                                            Soch Nayi  Serials
Star Plus television channel has lived up to its tag line “ Rishta wahi, soch nayi” (same relationship with its viewers, but new behind its programmes and shows)  in two of its serials Tamanna and Dehleez  that ended on Sunday. The two serials are women-centric and both deal with the distrust between Hindus and Muslims that cause riots and untold misery to innocent people belonging to both religious communities.
Tamanna in English means wish or desire or craving that enlarges into passion or boundless enthusiasm and  strong devotion with tireless diligence towards furtherance of a cause or an ideal or a goal.  The serial presents a girl’s passion for cricket that continues to absorb her even after she gets married and becomes a mother.  Hers is a genuine passion which cannot be quelled by external forces of family and society. Passion is like “ a mountain stream; it admits of no impediment; it cannot go backward; it must go forward”. The other serial, Dehleez meaning threshold (of a home or of pain or anything else) is also woman centric about a young woman lawyer with a passion for justice and moral rightness. The women protagonists of the two serials share a passion for humanity that cannot be rent by caste and religion. This is reflected in their zeal to bond Hindus and Muslims as citizens of one nation.
The central action in Tamanna takes place  in a small UP town of Bulandganj and that of Dehleez in Delhi, the capital of India. Zara takes up her assignment as the coach of a school cricket team in a small town where religious riots are a common occurrence on the slightest provocation, real or imagined. It looks as though the sparks are always waiting to be lit. Both the communities have suffered grievous losses and the younger generation is thus drawn into the swirl of communal hatred. It is ironic that while the Hindu boys and Muslim boys do not play together as a team, the cricket bats and balls are manufactured by the two communities who have had their share of fatality in the riots of yesteryears. Zara uses cricket which is a team sport to make a united team of the Hindu and Muslim boys.  She succeeds in uniting them and makes the younger generation go to town with the message of harmony and peace. As the serial comes to an end, Bulandganj, that was divided by religion for many years  stands united by cricket.
All through the different phases of  her life as a young girl, a wife, a mother and a committed cricketeer, Zara shows how to play cricket with a straight bat. While coaching she plays special emphasis on fielding – which in cricket not only demands alertness but a spontaneous action to contribute to the team’s success and to cement the bond among the players.. Cricket is indeed a great leveler and Zara shows how we should play the game of life like the game of cricket, fair and square with the inspired slogan of one team, one dream.
Every actor in this serial has displayed his/her histrionic potential to the full. All the actors exemplify the team spirit, for everyone knows s/he is a part of the drama and his/her role is vital to the success of the serial. This was best illustrated at the end by the inclusion of a boy in crutches as the twelfth man, who at the crucial moment of the play runs out the star batsman of the opposite side to give his team the victory. Anuja Sathe who essays the stellar role of Zara displays immense passion both for the game and for moral righteousness that impacts the rest of the team. She hurls a bouncer at her autocratic, self centred husband for failing to respond to her truthfulness, sincerity and altruism and decides to walk out on him. When he tries to come back to her, only because he does not wish to be bowled out by her, she throws a googly at him, asking him whether he is ready to sacrifice his ambition and be a partner in her cricket journey. 
Zara’s histrionic talent is at full display when her young school team wins the inter-school tournament. No oratory, no spellbinding dialogues but through gestures and facial  expression, she presents a simultaneity of multiple emotions of  joy, surprise, relief and gratitude. When she lets open the floodgate of emotions without a single word she reminds us  of Helen Wiegel inBertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage, who on seeing the dead body of her son screamed silently , a scream indicative of  "heart-rending vitality of all maternal creatures Zara’s passion is her legacy and Bulandganj erupts into passionate celebration of their young team’s victory. As she leaves the small town, Hindus and Muslims come together to bid farewell as a tribute to  her bringing brotherhood and camaraderie between the two communities.
The second serial features a young woman from Chennai who goes to Delhi to study and practice law. She stays with an affectionate three-some Muslim family, the Jilanis- comprising father, mother and son- who had been family friends for many years. Their college going son Azar and the young lawyer, Swadeenatha, have a wonderful brother- sister affinity  that is stronger than blood relationship.  The plot revolves round a conspiracy hatched by Iftikar Alam, a terrorist who befriends Asad as a Hindu young man  to get his father’s permission to rent the basement of their house. Asad discovers the heinous plot of the terrorist to bomb blast three areas in Delhi, one of them targetting the wedding of Swadheenatha to a bureaucrat. He passes on the information to the brother of Swadheenatha’s fiancé who is a Police officer, belonging to Indian Police Service. Despite their brave heroics, both Asad and the police officer are killed, the latter by the terrorist and the former by police forces who mistake Asad  as a terrorist and responsible for the murder of the police officer. Circumstances point to the Jilanis as a part of the terrorist group for harbouring Iftikar Alam(who calls himself Aravind Gupta) in their basement. Asad’s father is jailed and awaits court hearing. Swadheenatha’s entry into her husband’s family is halted at the threshold as she leaves to fight the case on behalf of her foster family. The prosecution lawyer is her mother-in- law, a legal luminary in Delhi.
The fight is for justice, for restoration of honour to a family which had been vilified on the basis of its religion on circumstantial evidence. The series is a courtroom drama, based in Delhi, which focuses on the bureaucracy of India, how the country works, and the high-level politics that happens behind closed doors. Swadheenatha exposes the planted evidence in Jilanis house and argues against inference based on indirect evidence. She wins the case,  frees Jilani and reveals the bravery of her foster brother Asad who is later decorated with bravery award.
What is striking is not the court room drama but the courage of Swadheenatha to fight for justice and truth, almost putting her marriage on the rocks. One’s patriotism and love for his nation cannot be worn on religious sleeves. Whether born into a Muslim or a Hindu family does not make one a terrorist or a patriot. At core everyone has a sense of belonging to the nation. Swadheenatha belonging to a south Indian Brahmin family develops a strong bonding for the Jilanis that gives her the conviction that an Indian Muslim is as much an Indian as an Indian Hindu. For her justice is more important than her personal life and she stakes her marriage on her passion to find the truth and restore justice to humanity. She sets foot on the dehleez of her husband’s home after her triumph to establish truth and justice.
Tridha Choudhry as Swadheenatha is outstanding, though others including her on- screen mother-in-law,Suhasini (played by Meghna Malik) are no less in their theatrical talent. The passion and courage of  conviction that Tridha displays equals the passion of Zara in Tamanna. Tridha’s and Anuja’s engaging fight for truth, justice, fairness, peace and harmony is central to the survival of humanity.  Hope Star plus gives its viewers more serials with nayi soch.


Monday 20 June 2016

smart minority and mediocre majority



A n article in the Sunday Times of yester week shook me up. The news item that deeply disturbed me had the headlines: “The whole world is waging war on unintelligent people.( I  take exception to the phrase “unintelligent people”  to refer to those who are not the intellectuals). The article is an indictment of the intelligent minority (again “smart’ is not the right wor  for Intelligent people as the word has a subtle, pejorative signification) who use the s-bomb to degrade the less intelligent as “stupid”. It concludes with a preachy paragraph from David Freeman: “W must stop treating our society as a playground for the smart minority. We should instead begin shaping our economy, our schools and even our culture with an eye to the abilities and needs of the majority and to the full range of human capacity.” These are great words dripping with egalitarian sympathy and affirming democratic principles of equal opportunity to level the meritorious and the mediocre. In fact, mediocrity is the blight of democracy. The encouragement of mediocrity breeds mediocrity. The result is the eclipse of the smart minority by the vast mediocre majority. The whole world is not waging a war on unintelligent people, but on the minority of intellectuals.
Paradoxically the same newspaper had a detailed report on RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan’s decision to return to academics with his statement of intent: “My ultimate home is in the realm of ideas.” RR3exit is proof of the war waged against the intellectual minority who is often accused as being selfish, arrogant and omniscient. It is the smart minority of Raghuram Rajans who provide the roadmap for a stable, welfare society and who are the enablers of the vast majority to realize where its potential lies and how it can rise up to its potentiaI. Amartya Sen, belonging to the intellectual minority speaks of welfare and development in terms of the society providing the needed   space and opportunity for every citizen to realize his/her  capability potential. Such a platform can be organized, preserved and supported only  by the small minority of educated and knowledgeable people.
The indelible fact of life is our body politic functions like our five fingers where each finger has a distinctive role to play and no one finger can claim to possess the ability to make the hand function optimally. The long and short of the five finger exercise is the recognition of the importance and use of every finger whose function cannot be replicated by the other four fingers. It is the same with human population.  All people are not endowed with the highest intellectual potential. There are those with distinct talent in creative fields like, arts, music, theatre and  dance; others with talent for sports. Many others have skills suited for working in industry and there are many who can take up just pedestrian jobs in shops and offices that require alertness and not any special skill or intelligence. While education is essential for the development of both cognitive faculty and competence even for mundane, run-of-the-mill tasks, it is only a few who can excel in academics and make use of it to generate ideas that are needed to develop society  holistically. Modern society regards the smart minority as a threat to the survival of the non-smart majority that is in large numbers .It is a known fact that the bad penny drives away the good penny. The smart minority is resented and frowned upon and is denied its rightful place in the new social and political structure in all democratic nations.
It is the smart minority who are the path breakers and pathfinders who pioneer a new idea or a new view or an innovation that contributes to public good. There can be only one Socrates, one Buddha, one Shakespeare, one Vivekananda, one Mahatma, one Aurobindo, one Ambedkar, one Mother Teresa etc.- only  one out of the billions of world population. How many Newtons, Einsteins, Ramanujans, Heisenbergs, Stephen Hawkings has the world produced?  Even the selection of a cricket playing eleven is reserved for those who comprise a small minority of talented players. In business the name Tata is associated with quality and trustworthiness. How many philanthropists we have like Bill Gates or in our own backyard, how many industrialists like Narayanmurthy have succeeded in setting a benchmark for global consultancy? We have just one Sreedharan as an exemplar of  dynamic leadership, one Kurien for pioneering white revolution,  one Swaminathan for starting the Green revolution in India to make the nation self sufficient in food.
Humanity cannot progress without the smart minority. They are the entrepreneurs who galvanize knowledge into vehicles for transforming society to a higher standard of living and welfare. Knowledge is a two edged sword- it has the power to create and the power to destroy. We know the advantages of harnessing nuclear energy for the benefit of mankind, but if misdirected it can sound the death knell of humanity. While learning and education give us knowledge, we gain wisdom by developing the ability to make good decisions with the use of knowledge. Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote: “Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers. “ The smart minority without the wisdom quotient often gets pilloried when it looks down on the rest as stupid. It is then that the vast mediocre majority reduces the smart minority to irrelevance. We have instances of history where Ashoka transcended knowledge to become Ashoka, the great. It is the other way round when a dynamic leader like Hitler used his knowledge to become a cruel monstrous hydra to decimate and murder six million Jews. Democracy should guard against such multi- headed hydras , but not at the cost of wiping away the smart, wise minority.  “A learned man is like a tank, a wise man is like a spring”.
The world is waging a battle against the intellectuals out of envy and the intellectuals sans wisdom have a scathing contempt for the vast majority who do not have the intelligence to be learned and educated. The two fight for hegemonic dominance- one through intellectual arrogance and the other through brute majority. It is like a plant in a garden  cohabited by an obscure weed that sucks at the water and nutrition needed for the growth of the plant. The plant bears no grudge against the weed and seems to share with the weed whatever is available. It is only the gardener who plucks the weeds for the plant to grow uninhibited. Some weeds attract beneficial insects, which in turn can protect crops from harmful pests. Weeds may also provide ground cover that reduces moisture loss and prevents erosion. Weeds may also improve soil fertility; dandelions, for example, bring up nutrients like calcium and nitrogen from deep in the soil with their tap root and  hosts nitrogen-fixing bacteria in its roots, fertilizing the soil directly. Some people have appreciated weeds for their tenacity, their wildness and even the work and connection to nature they provide. It is important to remember that weeds have as much use as the plants growing in the garden.
 It is the unintelligent  people who divide the smart minority and the mediocre majority, gnawing at the vitals of society. There is enough space to accommodate both. Both need one another. In fact in the theory of John Rawls these smart elites are needed in society to address and redress the problems of the disadvantaged majority. If a small minority is prevented from entering the realm of ideas, civilization will collapse. Much the same way, if the vast majority is looked down with disdain from the high pedestal of the intellectuals, it will engender envy and violence that will retard human growth and development.

Wednesday 15 June 2016

Religious Co existence and Respect for Diversity



                                       Religious Co-existence and Respect for Diversity(written in the aftermath of Florida massacre)
The topic given above  is an ideal that we all wish for-barring a minuscular and fanatic section of humanity.  The tragic events of recent times- as recent as the Florida massacre last week- sadly affirm that religious co-existence and respect for diversity continue being only an ideal with no possibility of becoming a reality. Acceptance of diversity and ceding space to all religions to coexist seem to be an idea, a conception that lacks practicality and the possibility of realization. The ideal becoming a reality seems to be a distant, if not an unachievable possibility. Let us take comfort and derive strength from Aristotle’s aphorism: “Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
 Probable impossibilities are things that can really seem highly unlikely to happen, but they are not completely outside of the realm of possibilities. These are events that when they do occur the response is usually something stunningly unbelievable-something one would not have expected to happen in a million years.  What it means is these are events highly improbable but are not completely impossible. Peace and harmony among all religions is difficult even to dream but when it happens, it will be a noteworthy and extraordinary happening.  In contrast, improbable possibilities are events that are of small importance and even if they occur despite being improbable their effects will be inconsequential. A short spell of cease fire by two warring nations is temporary if there is no mental and emotional leap to go with it.
Probable impossibilities in the context of today’s discussion consist of eradication of differences between different religions and faiths and upholding the values of equality and liberty. This is probably impossible today but possibly achievable in the future if we recognize the essential role of religion in our lives. Religion binds men and women as much as it sunders them. It has the power to unite and the power to divide. The innumerable religious groups all over the world testify to the fact that religion is something of an overwhelming importance to men and women. Global survey finds 63% of world population religious while only 11% are convinced atheists with the rest neither one nor the other. Even for the atheists and the group outside religious believers, God is the point of contention. But the conflict has never been between these groups of believers, atheists and agnostics, but only between believers subscribing to different faiths and  religions. For this vast majority, it is a strong belief in a superpower that controls its destiny. Pascal’s famous statement sums up the human urge to accept or deny the existence of God. Pascal said: “if you believe in God and He turns out to exist, then you have made a good decision. However if He does not exist and still you believe in Him, you have not lost anything. But if you don’t believe in Him, and He does exist, then you are in trouble.”
Common to all religions is the belief and reverence for a supernatural power regarded as creating the universe and the practice of sacred or ritual observances enjoined by each religion that has a built-in moral code of conduct and behavior. When a set of beliefs, values and practices is organized into a system of doctrine and gets institutionalized, it claims to the status of religion. The truth is there is only one religion and there are a hundred versions of it. But all religions aspire to the Infinity even if their ways and practices differ. The Infinity  is represented either as Sagun-one with Form as evidenced in the temple worship of the Hindus or in the worship of Virgin Mary and Jesus on the Cross by the catholic Christians or by the worship of Allah as the all powerful creator of a perfect, ordered universe or the worship of Yahweh by the Jews or the worship of  the holy book of  Guru Granth Sahib by the Sikhs or by the varied worships by people of different religions of God in an abstract or Nirgun form. Worship of a power that is Infinite, Absolute, Indivisible and Incomparable is the core principle of all religions. The religious practices differ in line with the culture and civilization of people belonging to different parts of the world. As stated earlier we, finite human beings have the urge to connect with the Infinite which in essence is a humble acceptance of our smallness vis-à-vis the might of the Superpower that remains unrecognized.
We have to find new ways to make probable impossibility of achieving peace, a probable possibility. It was a serendipitous discovery for me when I came across this quote from Robert Brault:  “Sometimes in a relationship, we fail to put two and two together because we want so much to keep one and one together… Who among us does not choose to be a little less right to be a little less lonely?” This quote is most relevant to the whole of humanity and more so to us in India where we all claim to be more right than all others and others as less right, if not wholly wrong. This manic holding to what one views as right has divided humanity into irreconcilable groups and also within those groups into splinter groups and ginger groups throwing the world out of kilter.  There is no such thing as absolute right and absolute wrong about any religious practice because all religions attempt to seek divinity and the grace of God.  There are differences in the approach to religion, but they should not compete with each other for dominance. The wars of yesteryears have only proved that nations subscribing to distinct religious beliefs fight to gain ascendancy at different times  thereby perpetuating and escalating the conflict between two perceived notions of right and wrong.  Rarely has the world witnessed a reconciliation of the two points of view especially in matters related to religious differences. The truth is there is only one God ; He has many names and He subscribes to all of them. He is All for one, One for all.
India and Pakistan have witnessed three wars after the 1947 genocide during the partition Even though the people of the two nations share many things in common in terms of food, dress, language, cricket and hockey, they follow different religions. The conflict is not just about Kashmir but extended to religious fundamentalism on both sides. It is naïve to say that we, Indians are morally, ethically and militarily righteous while all the blame is on Pakistan for the escalation of tension between the two nations. Pakistan’s claims to similar righteousness are also twisted and distorted. Both the nations, thanks to the intransigent leaderships, are living in a time warp, unable to move from the past era to the present era. It is worth remembering many of the older generation of Hindus and Muslims belonging to the era of partition have been subjected to inhuman suffering on both sides of the border. Those sufferings cannot be and should not be forgotten as they serve as grisly and shocking reminders of inhumanity. With memories of Nazi holocaust kept alive and lessons learnt thereof, the unification of Germany should serve as an example for humanity to come together. The great words of President Weizsacker, the first President of United Germany: “All of us (Germans), whether guilty or not, whether old or young, must accept the past. We are all affected by the past and liable for it. The young and old generations must and can help each other to understand why it is vital to keep alive the memories. It is not a case of coming to terms with the past. That is not possible. It cannot be subsequently modified or undone. However, anyone who closes his eyes to the past is blind to the present. Whoever refuses to remember the inhumanity of their past, is prone to new risks of infection.”
Is this a utopian solution? No, it is a pragmatic solution putting all the ugliness of the past behind. It is time for mankind to move forward. It is time not to press Past Forward, but press Present Forward. What does this involve? Let us recall Robert Brault who asks, “Who among us does not choose to be a little less right to be a little less lonely?” It is simple mathematics; Co existence for me  is less of my right+ more of your right while coexistence for you is less of your right+ more of my right.
Let me conclude with two wise sayings one by Sri Satya Sai Baba and the other from the Bhagavad Gita which are seminal to arrive at religious co-existence..
Sri Sai Baba says: “ Nations are many, but Earth is one; Beings are many, but Breath is one;  Stars are many, but sky is one; Oceans are many, but water is one; Religions are many, but God is one; Jewels are many, but gold is one; Appearances are many, but Reality is one”
The Bhagavd Gita says:
 ye yathā māḿ prapadyante
tāḿs tathaiva bhajāmy aham
mama vartmānuvartante
manuṣyāḥ pārtha sarvaśaḥ
Whosoever worships me through whatsoever path, I verily accept and bless them in that way. Men everywhere follow my path.
 It is time for all of us to begin a new revolution for peace and harmoyn, for religious coexistence and  respect for diversity. It is not enough to keep these thoughts confined within  a sanitized atmosphere f a Conference or a  Round Table Discussion. The revolution has to spread. Schools and colleges should teach the students the beauty and wisdom in each religion, to show respect for all religions and enable them to understand the oneness among diversity.  The problem is people all over the world have abdicated their rationality, rights and  humane  responsibility to a small section of political and religious leaders who are fanatics and fundamentalists for selfish interests. If people all over the world come together and retake their thinking rights and responsibility through rational, humane and peaceful revolution, the  probable impossibility of religious co-existence and respect for diversity will become a reality. Let us not despair as all is not lost with the world, the stars shine still.