Thursday, 3 October 2019

A Summer of Sadness


                                                            A Summer of Sadness
It has  been a Summer of sadness. For me as for many millions of Indians, the sudden exit of three political bigwigs of Delhi in quick succession has left a void that cannot be easily filled. Though they belonged to different parties and different ideologies, all three had distinct qualities that made them stand apart from other politicians. These three in their discrete ways raised the standard of Delhi life and contributed to a more orderly, more articulate and more energetic system of civil polity. Sheila Dikshit’s administrative skills, Sushma’s oratorical brilliance and Jaitley’s political suavity are examples of a modern, mature and aspirational India.  
This summer has been the cruelest summer personally for me. As a lover of literature it was a sad summer with the passing away of a hat trick of   great writers like Girish Karnad, Kiran Nagarkar and Krishna Sobti. In addition, there was the demise of half a dozen of my neighbours besides two of my close  friends one after the other. One of them was a colleague for more than twenty-five years, an intelligent, well read, gracious and warm person and the other was our family Jeeves who had become more of a brother to all of us during our seven decades association. However much one can philosophize about life and death, it is difficult to remain a stoic when confronted with the finality of the end of a particular phase of one’s life. The years that remain will necessarily be a new phase on a broken keel in the absence of all those who have disappeared forever.
     I realized that death is a shattering experience for all those left behind as we often hear the still sad music of humanity at different times from different places.  As I drove down the street where my colleague had lived, it crossed my mind that for her this will no longer be the road she had frequently travelled. We mourn the dead, but actually our sadness is more for our own plight of having to live the rest of our life without the ones who were dear to us. The new phase is unsettling to say the least in the absence of those who had . been a part of our life.
The irrevocable finality of life’s extinction has been poignantly sung by the 18th C poet Thomas Gray iihis Elegy written in a Country Churchyard. The following lines affirm the no return of the dear departed as nothing can rouse the dead back to life, nothing of life’s little joys or excitement can disturb them from their eternal sleep.
     The breezy call of incense-breathing Morn,
         The swallow twitt'ring from the straw-built shed,
     The cock's shrill clarion, or the echoing horn,
         No more shall rouse them from their lowly bed.

     For them no more the blazing hearth shall burn,
         Or busy housewife ply her evening care:
    No children run to lisp their sire's return,
         Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share.

But the truth is we do not mourn so much the dead as we mourn our own existence. Our tears may seem to be tears for the departed, but the tears are more for us, left orphaned by a decisive curtain call. But what about those who have transited –God only knows where to except that they have rent all the bonds that had till then tied them to their family, their home, their profession, their friends, their enemies… Nothing of those long years of human bondage has any meaning for them- not even a faint recollection of the world they had all this while belonged to. In the lines of Wordsworth,

Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting:
     The Soul that rises with us, our life's Star,
      Hath had elsewhere its setting,
      And cometh from afar
   
     This is the wonder of wonders. We forget the moment we exit from the world. When we re-enter, we have no recollection of any of the bonds we had held onto in our previous birth.  Hindu religion does not speak of Hell or Heaven as post- life destination, but of reincarnation which is the belief in the rebirth of the soul in a new body or a new form. The belief  in reincarnation becomes significant as it helps to  facilitate human beings to follow a life of virtue to ensure a better life in the future birth. Unlike the Christian-Muslim view that our lives begin at birth and will continue after death in heaven or hell, the Hindu theory of reincarnation is far more reassuring. Thus the incentive for a Hindu to be good is like opening a savings deposit that can be encashed in the next birth.   In a brilliant analysis of this theory of reincarnation in his latest book Why a Hindu should be Good, Shashi Tharoor says the incentive for a Hindu to be good is to have a better and more decent birth in the future.
He writes : “whereas in Christianity the body has a soul, in Hinduism the soul has a body. In other words, we are emanations of a universal soul, the atman, which does not die; it discards its temporal form, the body, from time to time…”
Even if such a theory has no empirical evidence, ( for that matter what empirical evidence is there that after death we go to heaven or Hell and where are these situated) it helps us to reconcile that what we are in our present life is the result of what we were in the previous birth. The soul is permanent and the body is temporary. There is no cessation of universal order which goes through the repetitive movements of birth and death as the soul transits from one body to another. Death marks the shedding of one body and birth marks taking possession of another. This continues till the soul attains its goal of self realization and attains moksha or final merger with the Oversoul or the Brahman from where it had originally descended.
This gives a plausible reason why we have no knowledge of our previous existence. Every birth is like starting over with a new clean slate. When we come into the world, we don’t carry any baggage of ill will or hatred as a carryover from the previous birth and all possible acts of revenge and anger and nurturing of grievances and hostility automatically get eliminated. It is another thing if one develops fresh enmity and hatred, but the incentive to be good to ensure better future birth can act as a deterrent from evil actions.
Birth and death are two ends of life. We are aware and conscious only of these two end points and the moment we cease to breathe, life comes to a halt. Even cancerous cells that furiously survive by eating into the vitals of a human being die along with the rest of the  body. With death everything comes to a full stop and there is no place for any other punctuation mark- be it a question mark or a comma to find connections between the present and the future. Pre- birth and post -death are blanked out and one is left with just the present.  It is therefore in our own interest- both for the present and for the future- to live the one and only life that we know and live it well. Living happily is contingent upon the happiness of all others who are a part of our life. No one can be singly happy if others around are unhappy. Envy, greed, anger, egoism and vengeful hostility are the end products of our attempt to widen the gap between self and others. It is often said means are as important as ends. If the ends are towards garnering a better life in the future birth, means have to be ethical, moral and just.
In this summer of sadness, I realized how we think of our own deprivation when we lose someone .
For the first time when I began to reflect on where that soul could have  gone and whether it will ever have a re-connect with the present, I understood the vacuity of such questionings. Those who have left will not return or even if they return, it will be a new avatar with no memory of a past link.
This is the way life goes on
This is the way life begins
This is the way life ends,
Not with tears of sadness for what is gone
But with tears of joy for what comes after.


Tuesday, 24 September 2019

Means to Ends is as Maths to Life


                                              Means to Ends is as Maths to Life
Elementary mathematics taught in schools give us the following formulae:
Plus+ Plus =  Plus
Minus + Minus = Minus
Simple mathematical equations. As a student many of us must have wondered and ( may still be wondering )  as to what earthly use these equations have unless one loves to pursue Mathematics and achieve the iconic status of a new age Newton or  Einstein or Ramanujan or Mandlebrot. Just a few weeks back I addressed a group of teachers on Teachers’ Day stressing the need to relate learning to life and spoke about the use of geometry in architecture seen in temples, churches, mosques and other religious places of worship. It is then someone asked me to explain the relevance of algebra to life and I was stumped. I could not give any convincing answer and the question troubled me as I was returning home after the lecture. This was on the 5th of September and precisely a month earlier, we had  the announcement by our Hon’ble Prime Minister and Home Minister seeking Parliamentary approval to abrogate Article 370 and change the status of Kashmir from a State to  a Union territory. As many as 400 leaders belonging to various political parties in Kashmir(with the sole exception of the BJP, the present presiding deity of Indian Parliament) were put under house arrest including ex Chief Ministers and all communications to and fro the Valley were snapped. Kashmir fell silent and has remained so till now. The Home minister announced that this was done in the interest of Kashmiris, to give them the sole right to be Indians without a pseudo status as Kashmiri. It was almost a la ‘mann ki baath’ ( the heart’s voice, that PM Modi has popularized through his monthly address to the nation on Radio) as the voice was not of the Kashmiris but only that of the PM and the Home Minister. It has been more than a month since the Valley had ceased to be normal. The last straw on the Kashmiri asmita (pride) was when the draconian PSA(Public security Act) was invoked to put the  octogenarian ex ex ex Chief Minister under detention without a trial.
It was a Eureka moment for me- when the relevance of the algebraic equations to life flashed through my mind.  The mathematical equations given at the top were at the root of Mahatma Gandhi’s famous statement that two wrongs don’t make a right. His insistence on ethical means to ends is only an affirmation of the algebraic equation Plus + Plus equals Plus. If the ends to be achieved are morally and ethically positive, the means must also be morally and ethically correct.  Gandhiji’s end goal of freedom was anchored in right and ethical actions.  He never stooped low to abuse the British rulers and made non- violence or Satyagraha, the cornerstone of the freedom movement. He recognized the inherent might of non violent passive resistance by millions of common men and women that cannot be quelled by autocratic rulers however powerful they may be. Satyagraha is a display of exemplary courage in the face of brutal oppression and an acceptance of pain and suffering that result from it. For him means serve the ends and not the other way about. Had he pursued covert and violent means, it would have proved counter productive  and  very unlikely we would have got our independence.  Minus + Plus will only be Minus.
Article 370 was promulgated in 1949 to felicitate Kashmir to join the Union of India. It had its Minuses as it barred non- Kashmiris to buy property and gave Kashmiris a distinct status other than the rest of India by having their own flag and legislative right to govern the State except on issues related to Defence, Finance and External affairs. Though it was a temporary instrument of accession to India, it could only be revoked  by the Kashmir legislative assembly.
Despite having an alliance with People’s Democratic Party to rule Kashmir, the BJP decided to snap the tie and dissolve the  State Assembly and replace it by Governor’s rule. Even when there was no legislative assembly, the abrogation of Art 370 was done without the ethical route of taking the  consent of elected legislative members which equates it with the consent of the people of Kashmir.. The decision to abrogate 370 by the Indian Parliament was not in keeping with the 1949 Instrument of Accession. The correct means was sacrificed to achieve the ends. This is where the algebraic equation comes into effect. Mathematical/algebraic formulae are based on logic to understand and often prove relationships between quantities and objects which may relate to no real phenomena. If there is a basic difference between the two entities- of one being positive and the other negative, the end results are invariably negative. The abrogation of 370 is certainly a move to bring Kashmir into the main framework of Indian Constitution. But just a day before announcing the momentous decision to abrogate 370,  to cancel  the Amarnath Yatra  and to ask the tourists- both Foreign and local -  to leave Kashmir citing possible terror attack have shown our Security  forces in a not too flattering light. If India cannot protect tourists on its soil, instead press the panic button of terrorism and  curtail the tourists’ travel in Kashmir, the negative fallout of India  being a weak state that cannot protect its citizens and visitors but  be easily bullied into submission by a bunch of terrorists could not be blotted out.
This has been the problem of governance in many respects. Respect for cows as Gau mata is a laudable principle to be followed. But this does not sanction lynching and killing –which effectively means taking law into our hands – even if cow protection is a legitimate and right goal of Hindus who are cow worshippers.  The silence of the government and the releasing of all those lynchers do not augur well for the end goal. Brutality, violence, inhuman acts of thrashing and killing have been the wrong means for a rightful end. A Minus and a Plus equals Minus especially when the vengeful mob fury is unleashed against innocents.
For full seven decades, the left ideology was dominant and despite its socialist stance for the amelioration of the poor and the downtrodden, it had become suspect as it tried to quell the right ideology as rooted in conservatism. The left ideologue in power had no patience with the right ideologue. The backlash has come now with the rightists denouncing all the leftists for their opposition to all things traditional and ancient. The atavistic cry of the rights today mocks the leftists for being pseudo intellectuals with western orientation and no mooring in their own tradition. Again two wrongs don’t make a right. The Left’s earlier intolerance of the Right cannot be remedied by the Right’s intolerance of the Left. Hyper nationalism is in conflict with liberal nationalism with no positive intellectual gain for either.
Secularism, the anchor of our Constitution is now mocked by the Rightists as sicularism and they seek a new identity for Hindus and Hindu Rashtra based on cultural nationalism.   How many understand the term culture? Is culture a static entity or a dynamic one? No culture in the world can survive if it refuses to permit evolution and change.  The problem is in our zest to hold onto what we believe in, we generate optical problems that blind us to the real meaning of culture. As Ortgea Gassett says, “ to see a thing, we must adjust our visual apparatus in a certain way. If the adjustment is inadequate, the thing is seen indistinctly or not at all.” Culture is the instrument of civilization. Humanity is the essential part of culture. Culture is external as it is seen in our words and actions, in our behaviour and conduct, in our way of living and in our relationship with others. Paradoxically culture is to be cultivated from within and should not be imposed from outside like a Government fiat. Culture does not pose philosophical question as to Who am I, but poses the sociological question What am I?  The I’ that we speak of is a given certainty in the sense’I’comes with a body and mind,  is born in a particular family, in a particular society and in a  particular nation. So ‘I’ has to live with all these  ‘given’which come with  birth.  ‘I’ has to live with the family, with the people in his society and in his nation; ‘I’ has to live among them. To quote Ortega,” Life means the inexorable necessity of realizing the design for an existence which each one of us is.” Culture is  to accommodate, adjust and accept the life that each one of us is designed and programmed to live. Hindu culture exhorts us to develop consideration for the feelings and rights of others , which inter alia, calls for humility and self control. Rg Veda tells us “let noble thoughts come to us from every side”.  The strength of our culture is its ability to absorb diverse thoughts and thread them into one unified culture that relates to the entire humanity.
It is time to realize  the logic of the Mathematical  equation whereby the two plusses of cultural nationalism  and  secular nationalism  are added to evolve a new concept of integral nationalism that is dynamic and progressive, vigorous and energetic, enlightened and forward looking- which is both past forward and  future present , modern and traditional, incorporating the concept of oneness in many and many in oneness.
Plus + Plus = Plus.

Thursday, 20 June 2019

A Sedition mukht Blog meant as a LOL


                                                            A Sedition mukht Blog meant as a  LOL
 The ink on my forefinger is still on though its spread is getting leaner and leaner. It is déjà vu for Modi and his party- better known as Modi –Shah party(MSP) and not as BJP or its distant cousin NDA. India re-experienced the euphoria of downing Congress and  swimming with Modi as it did in 2014 and the present jubilation is over the re-coronation of a Supremo whose self confidence continues to blaze through his slogan ‘Modi hai to Mumkin hai’.  The vociferous chant “All hail, Namo, hail to thee” has currently been overtaken by ‘Jai Sri Ram’ echoing from the Parliamentary hall. It is one way of strengthening their pious resolve  to model themselves on the MaryadaPurush to re-establish Ramrajya in Bharat.  I do not know if Sri Ram would have endorsed this holy cry of Modi Bhakts now turned into Ram Bhakts. How many of our honourable  MPs remember Gandhiji’s concept of Ramrajya which he wrote in 1929. Gandhiji said:  By Ramrajya I do not mean Hindu Raj. I mean by Ramarajya, Divine Raj, the Kingdom of God. For me Rama and Rahim are one and the same deity. I acknowledge no other God but the one God of truth and righteousness. Whether Rama of my imagination ever lived or not on this earth, the ancient ideal of Ramarajya is undoubtedly one of true democracy in which the meanest citizen could be sure of swift justice without an elaborate and costly procedure. Even a dog had received justice under Ramarajya”
               The oath taking ceremony of the freshly minted members has been on over the last two days There has been no interruption during this oath taking exercise except for the silence  now and then shattered by loud thumping of the desks for some special members like Sadhvi Pragya and Smriti Irani.  Smriti Irani was loudly cheered as the ‘giant killer’ of this election. What an irony! She had defeated Rahul Gandhi who was for all the modi acolytes a ‘pappu’. How did ‘pappu’ become a giant and Smriti become a giant killer ? Her victory was akin to  wielding a sledge hammer to swat a fly. When the ‘bhakts’ go euphoric, they tend to have short memories!
Victory is victory. It does not matter how it happens. EVMs have lived upto their reputation and displayed Every Vote Modi. Model Code of Conduct was scrupulously followed. Afterall what is in an acronym”? MCC is also Modi Code of Conduct. How does it matter if unemployment data was kept hidden and released only after the elections when it showed the huge all time low of employment figures? Again why fault the Modi sarkar when the elections have proved without doubt that people vote for promises made and not promises fulfilled. Who is bothered about the cacophony about unemployment, agrarian distress, faulty GST implementation, demonetization disaster, failure of intelligence that brought the Pulwama genocide, daily martyrdom of jawans and army majors  etc. etc., when the ruling party not even once referred to those contentious issues during the election speeches?  They were non issues for them and the silence of the ruling party made voters forget those issues. Master Strategy. The only goal was to win elections.  What a paradox! In spite of overwhelming allegiance to Lord Ram, revered as  dharmovigravan (virtue incarnate) the Modi party followed only Lord Krishna who said where victory is concerned, means should not matter..Gandhi differed and insisted on means  and not the ends. That is why Sadhvi Pragya praised Godse for getting rid of Gandhi, the anti Krishna.  Well our epics are handy and our Gita is a veritable treasure of quotable quotes for every occasion. Modi party has a magnificent IT cell that can uncork the heady brew of politics and spiritualism and assist its leaders to inebriate people with populist promises of a Ram Mandir and a Ravana vadham where Ravana is in the West. The muscularity of promises has a greater sway than the realistic emaciation of prosperity.
              The PM was at its magnanimous best when he delivered his first speech post election win. The heat of the elections was over and he offered cold comfort to the opposition asking them to let bygones be bygones which included the vitriolic attacks and blatant accusations made against ex PMs now in heaven( who knows , say Modi bhakts- may be in hell if not in water parched India.) Well, the victorious boxer after felling down the opponents with punches below the belt, in keeping with the tradition of sportsmanship offers his hand to the opponent to rise from the floor and embraces him. Modi bhakts clapped their hands in admiration and saluted their  leader for his magnanimity.
              PM had greeted 2014 win with an announcement of Swacch Bharat. He wielded the broomstick to clean the road that unfortunately did not have filth and dirt. Anyhow gestures and photo ops  are equal to a thousand words of oratory. If 2014 win started on a cleaning spree, 2019 win has begun with water that was absent in keeping the toilets clean. To make amends for aswachh bharat, the PM has promised piped water to all rural households. With water emergency currently in almost all the states and with women queuing for water with empty buckets, PM’s announcement sounds like the Biblical announcement “Let there be water and there was water.”  The thirsty populace virtually quenched their thirst over PM’s promise of water largesse. The earlier promise of chule mukht Bharat  was when PM gifted gas cylinders to poor women which was well captured in the huge hoardings in all gas stations. What if the second cylinder could not be bought? The PMs promise did hold at least for twenty days. So the 2019 promise  will certainly be a pipe dream. God bless our PM  for his watery promises.
                2019 new session has coincided with infant mortality in Bihar. There has been a stony stoic silence from the PM and his political ally, the Bihar CM and his  Deputy CM. What can they say when the villain is the humble lychee , the AAF(aam admi fruit). Maybe our urban fatsos need lychees to bring down their spiraling blood sugar level, but the urban man’s ambroisa is the rural child’s poison. What can PM or CM and all their men do, if lychee misbehaves!. Silence is the answer in such a situation, an art so well practiced by our PM for five years and presently emulated by his allies.
                PM is a man in a hurry. He should not be likened to Nero who was fiddling when Rome was burning. So when children are dying, when our soldiers are getting blasted and martyred, when water has become a vanishing commodity, his  ISRO team with its Chandrayaan project is going to explore the southern part of the moon in search of water. Dream big and that will be a comfort is the lesson to be learnt.
               Hence the PM dreams of one Nation, one poll. This is priority for the Parliament as it will bring in an enormous saving for the exchequer since the PM  and his ace deputy need not fly to make their Bharat Darshan all through the years. Only once, and that should be enough to seal the poll. Good strategic thinking. But the stupid emasculated opposition makes an inaudible protest as this would mean federalism mukht bharat. But PM has his last laugh. Does it matter if we have one more mukht? After all Hinduism preaches us that only body mukht souls can dare dream of ascending to Heaven.
               Hey, Modi bhakts, this is sedition mukht blog and don’t seek my incarceration in Tis hazari barracks.

Wednesday, 29 May 2019

The Tectonic Shift that triggered TsuNamo 2.0






                                       The Tectonic Shift that triggered TsuNamo 2.0
I had written TSUNAMO 2.0, even while the votes were counted. I tried to resist writing again, but could not control the urge to put down my thoughts as I viewed how the elections mirrored the tectonic shift that has taken place in our ideas and attitudes. The elections were fought (and won) on the supremacy in respect of the binary between Naamdars(dynasts)and Kaamdars. The open, no- holds  -barred  criticism targeted those who had the (mis)fortune to be born dynasts and therefore cursed from being  Kaamdars –people who work. What was implied in such averment that had a direct appeal to people was, all Kaamdars hailed from humble origins and all Naamdars never worked. But what this facetious argument missed to note, ( though lapped up by many millions of Kaamdars ,who harboured grudge and envy of Naamdars,)  was the assumption that the  Kaamdars  rising up to the highest position of the erstwhile Naamdars,  had to  compulsorily remain celebates,  for if they reared a family,  their  progenies would have to suffer the ignominy of belonging to a new Naamdar lineage.  This is in sharp contrast to my early days when we were under pressure to carry the torch so well lit by the illustrious ancestors of the family. One was never apologetic about one’s genes. When I was young, I had to study hard to top my class because my father was a brilliant engineer. My husband had similar compulsion because his father happened to be the headmaster of the school where he studied. We were not given any preferential marks because of our lineage, but the demands on our effort, partly self inflicted and partly imposed by society, ever ready to mock at  our inability to keep up the family honour, were incredible. The family pride was in our DNA and we treasured it and worked hard to live up to its standards.
In the present day, it is a sin to be born a dynast. Today the dynast coming up in life has his sin compounded as no one believes he possesses merit and that he can function as a Kaamdar.  If one gets into IAS, the wry comment will be “Oh! His dad, himself an IAS officer must have swung it for him. It is the same even with Bollywood stars where the non dynasts like Kangna Ranaut make similar disparaging statements about fellow actors who seem to come from celebrity families. The modern day attitude towards dynasts has no place for merit and attributes the son- rise solely to family lineage.   This is in stark contrast to the Biblical God’s proud proclamation about his son, Jesus whom he had sent to the earth to cleanse the people of their sins.
 PM Modi’s charge, shared by all his afficionadoes against Rahul Gandhi was that he was a Naamdar. Certainly Rahul’s birth is not his making or his choice. As Heidegger says, we are all ‘ thrown- into existence’ and we have no say as to  when, where and why we are thrown in.. But this has been made out to be Rahul’s sin and therefore he should be banished into political wilderness for trying to rise up in the political arena of his father, grandmother and great grand father.  The dynasty is criticized for committing one sin after another sin by coveting the party’s top post. But the truth is Rahul has been  elected by his  party just as PM Modi is elected by people. What is the sin committed by Naamdar to be accused that his election was flawed? His election as that of our PM rests on the final assessment where the winner takes it all- irrespective of the winner being a Naamdar or a Kaamdar. But this illogical reasoning repeated a million times, resonated well with a very large majority of people who do not have the good fortune to belong to Naamdar family.
This negative bias against the well heeled  group, at times also  referred to as the Lutyens group or the Oxbridge group or at a crass level Khan market gang  prejudiced the voters against  ‘Naamdars’ to edge them out for their twin sins of being born to a dynasty and therefore accursed never to work hard.  Harvard is no substitute for hard work, thundered our PM and the people went hysterical. Siddharth Bhatia writes: “Those who have voted for the BJP – and mainly for Narendra Modi – don’t merely think he will bring them whatever he promised, but also because they see themselves in him. He is not just their representative, he is one of them because he has risen from among them. The chaiwallah story, true or not, is a compelling one, because it not just inspires, it exemplifies the feeling that a humble man has shown the privileged their place.” The first shift is to accept the skewed perception about Naamdars and hail Kaamdars.
The second tectonic shift is seen in the way voters gather information. This is the age of social media- an extension of our attitude towards instant gratification of our senses, mind and intellect, though the last mentioned ‘intellect’ is not given too much importance today. It is a jet age and everything has to keep pace with it. Hence the demand for instantaneity from conception to creation, from idea to act, from emotion to response, from existence to essence has become the ideal. So gather all information from twitter and social media on your phone. It is instant. No one cares for authenticity or reasonableness or cultured discourse. We devour the information without ever realizing we are party to the instantaneous act of garbage in and garbage out. There is no time to sit and think- it is like stuffing and gobbling sandwiches on the run. Nothing sinks in; it is all surface skimming and that is more than enough to live life mediocre size. The new generation is becoming dumber and dumber and the dumbing down suits those who rule over them. The use of demagoguery in place of reasoned discourse by sleazy politicians is in line with gratifying cheap sensational instincts of a generation that shrinks from intellectual debates.
The third tectonic shift is a descent from collective humanity to insular nationalism, to spawning hatred in the name of security and hypernationalism that believes in the superiority of one's nation and its hoary past and seeking to establish a hegemonic society in which its ideology and its supportive religious faith  become so normalized that it is difficult for people to imagine alternatives. The old world values of integral humanism have no place in the war hysteria generated by leaders who are portrayed as the new avatar born to destroy all enemies within and without. The idea of India as a nation for the Hindus who are forced to tolerate  the co- presence of Muslims and Christians, Jews and Parsis is far removed from the earlier idea of an inclusive India.  The orchestrated cry against s(i)cularism and pluralism goes against the basic premise both of Hinduism and our Constitution. The move away from  the broad,  inclusive and pluralist vision of the idea of India has shifted to a narrower, distorted and bigoted idea of India  which has failed to make a distinction between Hindutva(or Moditva as the ‘bhakts’ call it) and Hinduism. Core Hinduism is based on the idea of acceptance while Hindutva seeks a superior role to it over all other faiths. As Shashi Tharoor says: “Hinduism is a very large, eclectic, vastly encompassing religion that has tremendous amount of choice of freedom within it, which is actually one of the greatest strengths of Hinduism. The problem with Hindutva is that it takes this vast all encompassing religion and tries to reduce it to something much narrower and specifically tie it to a political identity." The belligerence of Hindutva and its insistence on being a political ideology violates the basic tenets of Hinduism that believes in co- existence and accommodation of plural faiths, creeds and beliefs. The shift from Hinduism to Hindutva has been a major change in our views on religion and its inherent encompassing power. Hindutva imposes obedience while Hinduism celebrates individual freedom of worship and acceptance of diversity.
That leads us to the next shift in our admiration for muscular strength. Gandhiji, a frail looking man got us our independence through eschewing violence and aggression. His moral strength and fair means were enough to bring down the might of the Colonizer. Today all talk about love, peace, genteel manners, cultured language and civilized demeanour have become passeand it is replaced by aggression, violence, uncultured talk and gestures. People love this display of macho aggression in preference to   soft cultured discourse and dialogue   as they are opposed to Gandhian concept of non violence and gentle persuasion.
This election is remarkable for seeking votes in the name of one individual. The personality cult that it has spawned is at total variance with democratic collective consensus. The shift that is unlikely to be reversed in the near future is an unknowing and unconscious endorsement of democratic dictatorship from the democratic slogan of governance for, by and of the people. Those who questioned the legitimacy of the slogan “India is Indira, Indira is India’ have now shifted to a new slogan )Indiais Modi, Modi is India” It is now Moditva, Modinomics, Modi sarkar and this shift has taken root to endorse authoritarianism behind the façade of democratic sanction.    

One other major shift is the banning of the word ‘loyalty’ from our political ethics. Loyalty is no longer a virtue. One shifts loyalty without the least embarrassment like one changes clothes.  Shifting to the winner’s party s justified as it is done in the larger interest of the nation. Money speaks and money buys. Being loyal is defined as being faithful to one's oath, engagements or obligations. It means being honest and do not make it conditional. Our politicians loyalty is directly proportional to what they can get from those that have the power to throw crumbs. Loyalty, thy name is politician.

Lastly the tectonic shift is seen in our preference for shadow over substance,  for the immediate present, the ‘here’ and the ‘now’ over a sustainable far reaching insight into the future, for existence over essence, for conflict over dialogue, for hype over moderation, for vitriol over geniality and for chauvinistic intolerance to gracious acceptance of pluralistic ideas.
These shifts have taken place. They constitute today’s reality. One has to accept it. The question is  do we dare  to speak about tectonic shift without being labeled a naamdar, an anti national, a  pro liberal, a Lutyen’s votary, a Khanmarket gangster, an angrezi chamcha etc etc? Is silence the best way to protect our sanity or do we continue our inherited culture of being an argumentative Indian and seek  a reasoned dialogue to mirror the tectonic shift that has taken place?