An interesting centre page article in a leading daily holding the
Nehru-Gandhis responsible for keeping India backward in order to nurture a poor and
ignorant vote bank is an oft repeated attack of the BJP on Congress in its single- point focus on “Congress
mukht Bharat”. It tugs at the
heartstrings of all loyal congressmen and women, though no one denies a kernel
of truth in that vicious attack. The only defence is that kernel of truth had
no dishonest intention behind it as far as our first prime Minister, Jawaharlal
Nehru was concerned. Nehru believed in Socialism, having been schooled in the
Fabian philosophy. He modeled the economic policy for India on Fabian socialism
whereby the state owned, operated and controlled means of production, in
particular in the key heavy industrial sectors such as steel,
telecommunications, transportation, electricity generation, mining and real
estate development. Private entrepreneurship was not encouraged, rather it was
constrained by permit-license quota and high taxation. Nehru’s policies were
borne out of his genuine desire to uplift the poor. In the early years of
Independence, India could boast of many irrigation projects, mining projects(on
a personal note, I could testify that my
father had constructed hydro electric projects, dams and reservoirs, lignite
mining project, a deep water port at the confluence of the Mahanadi river and
the Bay of Bengal- between 1949 and 1962), steel plants , scientific research
laboratories etc. There was also the Indian renaissance of art, culture,
science and learning. It was Nehru’s vision of a Democratic Socialist State combining
participatory democracy with economic and social justice for all. But too much of State’s power and too little
of individual enterprise resulted in increased corruption and decreased
production and growth rates. What was followed by Mrs.Gandhi during her two
tenures lasting around 15 years was seemingly poor oriented(Garibhi hatao,
Nationalization of Banks, abolition of the Privy Purse to the erstwhile royal
families) but intentionally power seeking to get the votes of the marginalized
people. It was this trend that has led to the vituperative attack on the Congress
not so much for its failure to control poverty, but for its perpetuation of
poverty despite some of its mega schemes like Aadhar- linked MNREGA programmes.
While it is easy to be led away with the BJP slogan that Congress deliberately sustained poverty, the fact is
there has been substantial rise of the lower classes into the next rung of lower
Middle class, lower middle to middle and middle to upper middle. But the status
of the marginalized poor in the remote
corners of the tribal belt and in some of the interior Northern States like
Bihar, UP and Odisha has not changed and
this has given the whip hand to every
political party to include in its manifesto its commitment to wipe away the
tears of the last person. It is not the Gandhis alone who use poverty as a
magic wand to win over the poor, every single party does it. The only difference
is BJP has a higher decibal above that of other parties-in particular that of Congress.
The truth is everyone speaks of the poor, promises to care for them better than
others but once in power everyone
forgets them till the next elections.
The bitter and irrevocable truth is Congress has lost its status as a
strong opposition party though it is still the single largest party with 44
members in a house of 543. The Humpty
Dumpty duo of mother and son has had a great fall and not all the loyal
congressmen and women can put them back to power. Congress is today bereft of
all strategy to corner the ruling party despite the BJP’s gradual and strategic
unfolding of its fascist tendency. The happenings in the different
Universities-in the North (JNU),in the South(IIT, Chennai and Hyderabad Central
university),in the West(FTII) and in the
East(Jadhavpur University) have revealed the slow rising of the hydra of the Fascist
Right as opposed to the- pampering the poor- policies of the Nehru-Gandhis that
are left centric. The repeated imposition of sedition charges on dissenting voices
and scribes, charging them as anti-national is a political sleight of hand. We
have many chilling incidents that have taken place in the last year and a half–the
mob lynching of innocents on suspicion
of their eating and hoarding beef at home, the Ghar Wapsi
attempts to forcibly convert non Hindus to Hinduism, the burning and sacrilege
of the churches, the murdering of rationalists for their advocacy of reason
over superstition- and above all the silence of the PM on all these happenings
cleverly manipulating on the political stage the good cop-bad cop theatre to give the
impression that the PM is totally disassociated from the “fringe’ elements behind
those violent incidents.. The new binary of “national” an “ anti national” is
effectively used to allege that the Congress and the Left parties are
conspiring to disintegrate the nation. But if there is no opposition to counter the nation’s
fast slide towards hatred of “the Others” (those who are not with the party in
governance), it may slowly result in the whipping up of Xenophobia or
religio-cum ethnocentricity. All the poll promises of the BJP before the
elections have stayed as promises as there has been no sign of
“ achche din”, no end to the spiraling price rise, no seizing of black
money to fill the bank accounts of every Indian with 15 lakhs of rupees, no
thaw in Indo-Pak relationship, no visible development despite all the slogans
that are unleashed daily if not hourly. Even the promise of a corruption free government
has become suspect as evidenced in Lalit Modi’s case involving a high profile
Cabinet Minister and Chief Minister. The murky dealings in the Delhi District
Cricket Association had cast a shadow on the unimpeachable integrity of the undeclared No.2 in the cabinet. But with the deftness in articulation, BJP has
successfully side stepped all the promised manna and has invented new
nationalistic slogans to assuage the discontent that is brewing over the absence
of that promised manna.
A true democracy is one which gives the opposition to play the role of
a watchdog and offer constructive criticism to the ruling party in the interest
of the nation. But when the opposition squanders away the mantle (however narrow
it may be) that had been given to it, there is no hope for the nation to escape
governance by oligarchy covertly hoisted on democratic principle. Simply
sniping at the ruling party with repetitive phrases like “suit-boot ki sarkar”
or making personal attack on the PM( as if to show that we pay you in the same
coin which you used to oust us) has no impact on anyone, least on the ruling
party. The Congress is led by mother and son where the mother suffers from the
handicap of lacking fluency in Hindi and for that matter any Indian language
except Italianized English and the so,n the handicap of no experience in the
art of governance and also not gifted either with charisma or with eloquence
which even the ordinary BJP worker has in abundance. What is attempted is intemperate cavillation
without getting to grips with major social, political and economic issues and providing
an alternate strategy for those issues bungled by the ruling party. The foolish attempt to stall the Parliament
as a tit for tat measure has not won the party any gain; on the contrary only more
of sardonic sneer.
Unfortunately the mother and the son understand neither the grass roots level approach to relate to the masses nor the political chicanery needed to counter BJP’s shenanigans, so adroitly employed by its spin masters. The saying in Tamil that I do not know to build a nest, but I know to bring it down is also not working for the Congress. It cannot seek the moral high ground because in the past some of its actions were neither legitimate nor morally defensible as every action of the present government that is questionable is countered with a repetitive taunt of the pot calling the cattle balck.
Where does it leave the
country? Is there no hope for India? How
long do we wait for the BJP’s promise of
acche din? After almost two years since BJP returned with a thumping majority,
isn’t there a creeping unease that the BJP bubble may burst sooner than later!
But what holds as hope for the BJP to sustain itself in the corridors of Delhi
is the TINA factor. There is no countervailing force to unseat the BJP. The question that is relevant today is can
the Congress reinvent itself?
The answer will be a
resounding ‘NO’ if the Congress holds to the mother and the calf. The two may
be personally honest andcome frm Nehru’s pedigree to keep the interest of the
nation above personal interest, but frankly they simply do not have it in them
to inspire such confidence or to build the party. The AAP had shown that it can
appeal to the aam admi and garner votes. It has shown the spirit to fight
obstacles that come in its way to govern as per its poll promises. It has the
ingenuity to bring forth schemes that serve the people even if marginally- schemes
such as piped water, odd-even scheme, upgrading of teacher training, setting up
of Mohalla sabhas and Mohilla clinics.
Congress should take lessons from AAP for framing new strategies that satisfy
the desires and yearning of India of the 21st century. Foremost is
accessibility. Accessibility to people is an asset ; a denial of it is to
commit harakiri.
Like a bird molting,
i.e., shedding of its old feathers and replacing them with new ones, Congress
has to begin afresh, replacing the old guard
with new dynamic young people who have the vision, the integrity, the power of articulation and above all the
charisma to infuse dynamism within the party and among the people. Congress
should start on a clean slate, accept its
past mistakes, re-engineer its positive programmes to meet the present
day requirements, gain acceptance and credibility by being honest and truthful
to the founding principles of Congress namely, democracy, secularism,
scientific socialism tempered by intense humanism. To achieve this, Congress
has to work out a new policy that combines liberal capitalism with democratic
socialism. At first sight, the two seem
to be incompatible but on a deeper analysis, the two can co- exist as private
public partnership. By focusing on thrust areas like roti, kapda and makan,
medicare and education the government can ensure a Welfare State . The emphasis
should be on a system, based on social justice and equity with minimum
interference in private enterprise and business. Unless Congress reworks its old slogan of
Garibhi hatao with the new mantra of Natural Equity and makes people a partner
in achieving economic, social, intellectual ad religious freedom, Congress will
fade away into eternal sunset.
There is no dearth of
high thinking and well meaning individuals in the Congress party. But what is
missing is a rallying point like the one provided by Pt. Nehru. There may have
been flaws in his policies that we see today in hindsight. To speak of Nehru
only with reference to some wrong policy which were not intentional nor had any
personal axe to grind is not only being unkind, but being ungrateful. It is ime
for the Congress men and women to set up a new agenda of reforms, to seek a new
leadership and seek alliance with like
minded parties to usher in a modern re-Discovery of India.
No comments:
Post a Comment