Sunday, 1 May 2016

The Contemporary Argumentative Indians



                                        The Contemporary Argumentative Indians
The familiar headline “Parliament is adjourned” carries no suspense any longer. It is the same story during every session of the Parliament- a ritual that had been in practice since the dying days of UPAII. Shouts and counter shouts forcing the Speaker to adjourn Parliament have been justified as they are a part of the constitutionally sanctioned means for the opposition to stall the functioning of the Parliament. The daily drama in the Parliament has the familiar ring of the “Times Now 9 pm show with Arnab Goswami” except that it is played not in the TV studios but in the privileged and sanctimonious theatre of the people’s representatives. Except for a few MPs who exercise their lungs shouting and who exercise their limbs by running to the Well and flaying their arms, for the majority of our elected leaders, it is a paid holiday. Even at the cost of committing perjury, I would like to add, MPs at the Parliament are well provided for that includes a good daily allowance, subsidized lavish lunches in the canteen and free transport facility. Since for most days Parliament does not function, MPs enjoy a sinecure job .The budget session in hot summer, the rainy monsoon session and the short winter session intended  for conducting legislative business often get disrupted  with discussions veering away from deliberations on matters of public interest to mutual attack on each other by the ruling  party and the opposition. The passing of the budget with minor amendments to the finance bill and pre-determined rollbacks is annually done without heated exchanges as it relates to the financial interest of the Parliamentarians –their huge salaries, perks and funds for disbursal in their respective constituencies (MPLADS-Member of Parliament Local Area Development Schemes). Rarely the Finance Bills are withheld which brings a smug and satisfied look in our MPs for having discharged their legislative responsibility for the year. As for the rest of the sessions, it is one of cacophony and pandemonium where everyone wears his/her morals on the sleeves and indulges in picking holes in the sleeves of the opponents. The two major contending parties-the numerically strong right-wing  BJP and the abysmally weak left of centre Congress are daily at daggers drawn over trivial issues, deliberately to  avoid discussions on serious issues which will cause  huge embarrassment to both sides. The mutual attacks are mainly the choice  feeds for the insatiable hunger of the media that seizes on them to hold forth and pontificate, while simultaneously donning the three-in-one cap of prosecutor, judge and executioner and lambasting all the participants of the debate who are willing sacrificial lambs for the money and exposure they get in return.
             The truth is Parliament and media discussions today have turned out to be more of a circus show except that the feats performed are not physical but verbal feats that in turn are music  for the ears of the loyalists and off tune for those in the opposition. The issues that are taken are those that are calumnious in nature with charges flying thick and fast with no one to affirm the truth or the falsehood behind them. For a week these issues are debated in the Parliament and in the media with no one becoming wiser at the end of it all. Then they are dropped like hot potatoes as soon as a new allegation crops up providing fresh ammunition for another cacophonic debate and discussion. What is most surprising is all these allegations have a short shelf life. There was the Vyapam scam, Gujarat State Petro chemical scam, Lalit Modi episode involving top BJP women leaders, FTII controversy, Rohit Vemula’s death at Hyderabad Central University, Kanhaiya’s imprisonment and the anti national sequel, the tampering of tapes of the JNU episode, Mallaya’s British connection, the current Augusta Westland scam and many more with the ruling BJP tracing all the ills to Congress leaders(-in particular the Gandhis, as a part of their Congress Mukht Bharat andolan)-  and the opposition, in turn  raking up a host of charges, in particular about freedom of expression, freedom to eat, freedom to live -all pointing to  the ruling party’s subtle move towards a fascist regime. But despite the decibel ringing high for a week, no conclusive evidence emerges and the proverbial short memory attributed to the mindless public can be well  and applied to our politicians. There is nothing for anyone to affirm, there is nothing for anyone to deny, nothing to allege, nothing to prove and yet the humungous desire to hold forth on these non governance issues  and to pitchfork them centre stage in and outside the Parliament. Drought in Maharashtra and Karnataka, spiraling food prices, gross unemployment of educated Ph.Ds and MBAs ,not to speak of less  and least qualified young men and women, shrinking rupee and rising dollar, blow hot blow cold polices with regard to Pakistan and China, environmental pollution( except for bashing odd-even scheme of AAP), rising crime graph in the country etc  are all relegated to the status of non issue so as to keep  the debated irrelevant issues boiling hot, albeit for a short period. Perception and not pertinence is important, impressions and not authenticity matter.    Listening to these debates or reading about them in the dailies, I am reminded of the famous comment made by Samuel Johnson on Addison, his contemporary who had written three Latin poem . In his inimitable style, Johnson writes: “Three of his Latin poems are upon subjects on which perhaps he(Addison) would not have ventured to have written in his own language- The Battle of the Pigmies and Cranes; The Barometer; and A Bowling green. When the matter is low or scanty, a dead language, in which nothing is mean because nothing is familiar, affords great conveniences; and by the sonorous magnificence of Roman syllables, the writer conceals penury of thought, and want of novelty, often from the reader, and often from himself.”
              Maybe this article will come handy to  kick start a debate in the Parliament and also in the Media for  politicians and media anchors to  question the propriety of such sacrilegious writing against hon’ble members elected to Parliament, a venerable institution established by the Constitution.

No comments:

Post a Comment