Towering Silence: an Audible Response to
the Tower of Babel
Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh has been canonized as the Saint of Silence- ‘Maun
Mohan Singh’ by the PM-in- waiting. PM has to be thankful to his challenger for
conferring upon him the haloed sainthood in the midst of the loud cacophony
echoing from Television studios to political platforms to the soundless bytes
on the social media. Though the next elections are at least a few months away,
many in the opposition have already sounded the bugle for the battle of the ballot.
But our PM’s bugle sounds –rather mews -only once a year from the ramparts of
Red Fort on the 15th of August. Of course his voice is heard with rapt
attention outside India when he addresses the UN general assembly or Press
conferences on board when he flies to and fro his visits to foreign countries.
But in India when he convenes and addresses state Chief ministers or the
National Integration Council, he is dubbed a silent speaker by most of the Chief
Ministers from the opposition ruled states who show utter disrespect
to his invitation by being absent at the meetings. This is the best way to
ensure that the PM remains for all of them a Maun Mohan Singh.
PM is indeed a silent man. He is
not a man of words to cross verbal swords with his opponents who keep baying
for his honest blood. From 2G through Coalgate scams, he has remained a mute
spectator to the vociferous demands in the two Houses of the Parliament for his
resignation. This calls for a herculean strength to remain silent in the face
of a deafening cry from the rank and file of the opposition that he is a ‘chor’. His silence does not mean that he is
indifferent or not pricked by those needles of suspicion on his integrity and
honesty. In the ninth year of his PMship for the first time, he broke his
silence with the question that reflected a sense of hurt over being personally
attacked by the main opposition. "Have you heard of any country where the
Prime Minister is not allowed to introduce his council of ministers?...Have you
heard of Parliament in any country where the opposition shouts in the well
'Prime Minister chor hai' ”? These are a
few occasions when he freed himself from his cave of silence, since the remarks
from the opposition about his position and stature had gone beyond the basic
standards of decency.
Why
is PM silent?
Is it a genetic quality that he has been born with, unlike his
illustrious predecessor Jawaharlal Nehru who has been often referred to as a silver-tongued
orator? Maybe PM had his early lessons on the quintessential proverb: ‘Speech
is silver; Silence is golden’.
Or is it
a deliberate strategy to make his critics let off steam while he silently moved
full steam ahead with his own economic calculations and nuclear policies?
Or is
he following Shakespeare who said: ‘The silence often of pure innocence
persuades when speaking fails.’ ?
Or is his silence an articulation of his
disapproval of indecency and unseemly conduct unbecoming of the elected
representatives?
Or is it an economic calculation that the more words you expend,
the less will be their significance and import?
Or like a true economist does
he believe in the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility and says that the first unit of consumption of words yields more
utility than the second and subsequent units, with a continuing reduction for
greater amounts?
Gandhiji often resorted to ‘maunvrat’
as a way of discovering the right path to living. For him it was also an act of
cleansing his thoughts of negativity and anger. Silence helps one to remain
calm and not fight words with words. In the aftermath of ‘maun vrat’ the words
that one utters are always heard with rapt attention. Gandhiji said: ‘Silence
becomes cowardice when occasion demands speaking out the whole truth and acting
accordingly.’ Man Mohan gives up his silence and speaks only when he has to. The
words he utters are truthful, and no one can fault him.
It is good that Man Mohan is for the
major part Maun Mohan. His Oxonian and Cantabrigian education has not taught
him the art of bluster and filibuster. In these days when the world is agog
with twitter and its messaging limited to 140 characters, when sms has monopolized
communication, then why grudge our Professor of Economics for being economic
with words? He is indeed the best among
twitters who doesn’t need even 140 characters.
When I joined English Honours I
listened to the first lecture on Shakespeare’s Richard II. The Professor’s hour
long lecture was to distinguish between Richard II, the King and Bolingbroke (later
known as Henry IV) the usurper. The Professor ended his lecture with a smug
look on his felicity with words: ‘Richard was a man of words, Bolingbroke was a
man of action’. Our PM like Richard II is the present holder of the PM’s chair,
but unlike him, not a man of words. The claimants to his chair are men of
words, though they have not demonstrated that they are like Bolingbroke- men of
action( except rushing to the well and shouting ‘PM is a chor’ or walking out of the
parliament.)
What will be the future of Indian
history? Who will succeed -the silent defendant or the vociferous
challenger? Will history record the unspoken
thoughts, feelings and the major milestones of the silent PM or record the
spoken, acerbic, no-holds-barred verbiage of his critics? Will future history
be a record of twitters or buried in silence? Will it present for a third time
in row a man with towering silence or a man with a tower of words? Time alone
will tell for it has no use for words.
Note: I have not attempted to defend the indefensible silence of our PM. My
article has raised the question of the Hobson's choice before the voters-between silence
and garrulity. It also speaks about the present crisis in our
post-independence history as to whether the PM will be relegated to a
footnote in the annals of history dealing with this period-despite
whatever he has achieved and whatever he has missed out(including the
art of speaking). The reading on the wall is clear unless we get a host of good articulators from the Congress to
compensate for the deafening silence of our PM( and also of the PM of
congress-in-waiting)
No comments:
Post a Comment