Tuesday 1 August 2017

Good Research Promotes Good Teaching



                                           Good Research Promotes Good Teaching
The Hon’ble HRD minister’s statement making research optional for college teachers puts paid to any semblance of quality improvement in Higher Education. The only silver lining is that it is a Minister’s statement and not one of  the Ministry’s policy decisions. Maybe his statement is merely to provoke a debate on this subject.His statement addresses two issues- one dealing with academic research by teachers in colleges and the other with grade promotion using the API(academic performance indicator) score  that gives weightage to research. The Minister has retained the API score for promotion but given a huge leeway for teachers to dispense with research in their disciplines. It is debatable whether college teachers will rejoice in receiving this largesse from the Minister or feel a sense of humiliation, loss of esteem  and unworthiness that the universities have no value for research undertaken by them and that they are inferior to their counterparts at the university.
It is difficult to understand the rationale behind this announcement especially at a time when higher education is in deep crisis today. The quality and standard of higher education is far below the standard of world top universities and the number of top class research papers from our universities is pathetically negligible. There have been incessant discussions about the strategies needed to raise the bar to make our universities come closer to world class universities. But no visible improvement has taken place despite the innumerable recommendations given by committee after committee, set up by the HRD Ministry and UGC to improve the quality of input and output in our universities. It is ironical why now no committee has been formed to analyze why all these strategies have not yielded the desired result  and why all the ministry’s men and women and all the UGC’s men and women could not put universities back on its rail. But it is not a rocket science to know why our universities are on a steady and at times alarmingly steep decline.
1.      The strategies that are being mooted are not by college and university teachers. The university and the colleges get instructions from the UGC which functions as His Masters Voice of the HRD Ministry. It is only the wearer who knows where the shoe pinches. The teachers know what impedes institutional progress and what remedies are needed to overcome them. To set our house in order, we need the family members to deliberate the problems. How can members sitting in their air-conditioned rooms far removed from the University and college campuses, appreciate  the problems both of the teacher and the taught?  
2.      The political correctness has made our politicians and leaders promise to open the university portals to all who desire to enter these hallowed gates. But who has the daring to limit the university admissions to those who have displayed their potential for pursuing higher studies? Instead of setting up institutions to provide university recognized degrees in skill training, the present policy of reservations in colleges to all those who wish to enter, have neither equipped the students with job competencies nor made them acquire knowledge to pursue high-end research, catering to society and present times. Higher education is not a welfare measure to be distributed universally. The goal of higher education is to discover new ideas, thoughts, concepts and theories that have a far reaching impact for mankind. It was one researcher Martin Cooper who invented the mobile phone that serves millions of people. While Edison invented the motion picture camera, the Lumiere brothers invented the single device to combine film recording and projection that provides maximum  entertainment to maximum number of people. Three  inventors ,Philo Farnsworth, John Logie Baird and Charles Francis Jenkins  created the television that is enjoyed by  viewers in every part of the world. All inventions in medicine, astronomy, science, satellite communication etc are by university researchers for the benefit of the entire humanity.  Higher Education requires committed, inventive and gifted intellectuals who have the potential to make a quantum leap into darkness and bring forth light. “Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought" [Albert von Szent-Györgyi).  It is no longer missing the wood for the tree, but missing the tree for the wood.
3.      This links the issue to the question of autonomy for institutes of higher education. Since one shoe does not fit all, universities should have the autonomy to decide courses, curricula, fee structure, examinations, admissions, rules and regulations governing the different stakeholders in higher education. The same autonomy has to be ensured for colleges, subject to the approval of the degree granting university.
4.       Any academic, worth being called an academic will not rest content with what s/he had learnt as graduate students. With the rapid advances in knowledge and still more rapid advances in the use of technology in learning and imparting that knowledge, the academic is under constant pressure  to keep abreast with the developments in theories, concepts, ideas and scientific experiments   in his/her discipline. It is no exaggeration to say that a good teacher is always a learner.
5.      It is here we see the value of research. What our universities and colleges lack today is quality research by its faculties where they co-opt their students in their work. Javedkar’s announcement that teachers in colleges need not do research but concentrate on teaching is like ladling soup from a pot that has either no soup or has just remnants of old soup in it.  An Indian Professor at Carnegie Mellon University has pointed out how our industry is unaware of the fourth industrial revolution that is happening all over the world and that is disrupting all old industries on a global scale. This is sadly true of our academic institutions where quite a few teachers are content to peddle with old antediluvian knowledge that is of no use to the modern generation. The hard reality is there is a wide range of technologies specially in the fields of Artificial Intelligence, robotics, computing,  genomics, cyber security, sensors etc,  that are changing the lives of people and unless the students learn these developments, they will find it difficult to be absorbed by industries.  In Humanities and Social Sciences, we have courses in International Relations, Development Studies, Peace Building, Anthropology, Archaeology, International Jurisprudence,  Public  Health Entomology, Disaster Management, Wildlife Conservation, Habitat Conservation and Policy Making, Eco system, Special Education etc, that   have an enduring bearing not only in terms of career opportunities, but also gto ive students a glimpse into understanding social responsibilities. For this the teachers should possess adequate knowledge through intensive study and research. If teachers stop doing research and turn out to be just good teachers carrying old hackneyed studies to the young students, the whole system will generate mediocre graduates with no knowledge, no skill and no competency  to cope with modern age demands and be job worthy.
6.       Colleges are the transmission lines to universities and employment. Raising the quality of education is raising the intellectual calibre of the teachers, both of colleges and universities.  The last few decades have seen an erosion of new ideas which are essential for the growth and development of society. It is said that the last quarter of the previous century was a post- idea period where our universities had abdicated their primary responsibility to generate new ideas to meet the demands of a technology driven society with its extended reach through mobile phones, television and new modes of transport. Old values have become suspect and new values have not emerged to replace them. The new generation, gadget- oriented without sufficient knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages has fallen between the two schools of thought- the old and the new. Research and guidance in research are essential at all stages of higher education.
7.      Making research optional for college teachers is cutting at the very foundation of higher education. Research helps not only in gaining fresh knowledge, it enables one to articulate this new knowledge with clarity and lucidity.  Javedkar’s statement closes all options for teachers and their students to leap into the future and build their competitive advantage with the rest of the world. It would have been a new and salutary proposition if  the API(Academic Performance Indicator) had been revoked. Teachers have tried to garner needed points at the API appraisal  through spurious papers presented and published for the sake of promotion to the next grade. Making research optional is not a solution to end the worthless plagiarised papers by teachers solely for the sake of API. It is like throwing the baby out while retaining the bath water.
8.       If quality improvement is the goal, it can be accomplished by making research mandatory for all faculty members, by improving the infrastructure necessary for research, by reducing teaching hours that are currently stipulated at 16-18 hours per week to half the number so that the teacher functions mainly as a catalyst and gives a capsule of what is to be taught. This alone can encourage self study by the students on the basis of those lectures. The teacher’s role is a three-in-one role, that of a researcher, a learner and a teacher. There can be no distinction between a college teacher and a university teacher. The bias against college teachers in the university academia has to be removed. This new announcement of research to be non mandatory for the college teacher is perpetuation of this bias that makes them second citizens in the world of academics. It is also the surest way of killing all incentives for self development besides lowering their self esteem and making teachers divert their time to activities that are far removed from academics.
9.      Lastly, let me point out I had the privilege to preside over a college(Gargi College) that had a host of brilliant researchers in physics and chemistry, humanities and social sciences that gave  it the distinction of a College with Potential for Excellence . UGC bestowed a special grant to the college faculty to undertake research and community service projects. The Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India  awarded STAR College Grant. The college serves as an illustrious example of how research nourishes both intellectual development and self development.
I make the plea not to baulk college teachers of their potential to pursue research as research alone can  enhance the quality and standard both of teaching and learning.

No comments:

Post a Comment