One of
many, Many of one.
Indian elections in recent times have touched a new low that is
embarrassing both for us in India and for all civilized minds elsewhere who are
already subjected to daily dose of low level tweets from the White House. The
recent outburst of the President of the ruling party using a metaphorical
analogy to dehumanize opposition political parties is a case in point. Despite
the logical defence by the party that its President had not made any direct one to one link between dogs, cats,
snakes, scorpions etc to any single or
multiple opposition parties, the remark was not only distasteful but was
symptomatic of the war of attrition employed by political leaders as a strategy to win the elections by wearing
down the opposition through the use of uncultured and uncivilized language. The
election debate today is not about ideologies or about issues that affect the
nation and its people or about new thinking, new directions, new ideas that
will galvanize the nation to a new age of advancement in its social, economic,
intellectual and ethical spheres. It is only about personalities and calling
names to insult them. The language is abusive, vituperrious and uncivil.
Unfortunately the effect of uncivil behaviour on the masses lasts longer well
beyond the election period and leaves an indelible residue of bitterness, hatred
and violence in society. The last four years have witnessed frenzy among our
masses who are first divided on caste, class and religion and then adequately incited to see ghosts where there
are none and follow this with aggressive killings, at times sometimes
spontaneous and even unpremeditated. Our leaders, not really fully aware of the
consequences of their words on the masses have influenced crowd psychology to
suit their immediate purpose of winning the elections.
Crowds are of two kinds- active mobs and passive audiences. The active
crowds are aggressive and expressive and often turn violent. These types of
mobs are the reason why it is wrong to incite them through use of abusive and
hate filled language. Wth regard to crowd psychology, it is shown that whole communities suddenly fix their
minds upon one
individual, and go mad in following the individual and his
pursuit. We have seen this at work during Hitler’s mesmerizing
the Germans to destroy the Nazis. Millions of people
become simultaneously impressed with one
man, one hero, one delusion, and run after him till
such time their attention is caught by some new
folly more captivating
than the first. One of the causes for individuals
developing herd mentality is it frees them from personal responsibility and
gives uncivil behaviour the impression of universality of behavior, both of which
increase with the
size of the crowd.
In India 1984 riots was one such incident of herd psychology that drove people
to heinous murders. It is now three and a half decades since the anti Sikh
riots took place. The scars of the riots
are not, nor can they ever be erased
Today the coarse and bullying
language used on the social media like Twitter and Q&A platforms has a
lot to do with the language of our political masters. The constant effort to
bring down great men and women of the past on the alleged charge that they
had been too long on the historical pages
to the neglect of many others of equal or even greater status has
blurred the line dividing truthful facts and imagined falsehoods. The
recognition of greatness need not be done by pulling down the heroes of the
past. The process of addition cannot be done by the process of
subtraction. On all matters, political
or sociological, economic or ethical, controversy rages between contending
parties to such a degree that there is no end to the contumely heaped on each
other. There is no attempt to hide or conceal the harsh or scornful language
employed by the Facebookers, Online bloggers
and Twitteratis. Social media is a powerful
tool in perpetuating herd behaviour. Its
immeasurable amount of user-generated content serves as a platform for
opinion leaders to take the stage
and influence the masses
In all this, the greatest casualty is loss of self
control. These website posters take advantage of remoteness and faceless
identity and resort to scurrilous writings that are offensive to accepted
standards of decency in crass imitation of their political masters.. They
have lost control over their emotions that have been roused by the current
crop of leaders who are gerrymandering the election vocabulary for political
purposes. The loss of control over one’s emotions, actions and words is all
pervasive. Every day we read reports
of shooting in blind anger, violence and murder due to road rage, killings
committed under the pretext of righteous indignation, stonewalling legitimate
discussions and debates in the parliament, terrorist attacks arising out of misguided
religious hysteria… one can go on citing examples of lack of self control in
all acts of wanton destruction of life and property. It is easy to pick up a
gun and thoughtlessly pull the trigger. But the life lost in this act is a life
snuffed out forever. Can there be any way to restore the dead to life? It is
finished, finished once and for all. Investigations, trials, justice,
punishments etc cannot bring back the dead to the family that has lost a son
or a daughter, a brother or a father, a wife or a mother. All these are happening
due to lack of self restraint. They occur not as acts of isolated, mentally
unhinged individuals but are collective acts indulged by the masses, referred
to as ‘crowd psychology’ by Freud and ‘collective unconscious’ by Jung. Herd
psychology or mob psychology is frightening and unnerving.
While
there are instances when herd behaviour has been benign as in the case of the
Nirbhaya movement with its integrative social function, more often than not,
we see its negative fall- out. The frequency of rape incidents by a group of
savage men of helpless women and innocent children is a chilling example of herd
instinct raising above human instinct. According to Freud, in a crowd, the overall
shared emotional experience reverts to the least common
denominator (LCD), leading to primitive levels
of emotional expression, almost that
of the ‘primeal horde’ or pre-civilized society. Mass rape arises out
of lack of control over sexual urges in typical crowd situations. This is what psychologists
refer to as de-individuation theory. “All
factors such as anonymity,
group unity, and
sexual arousal weaken personal controls (e.g.
guilt, shame, self-evaluating
behavior) by distancing people from their
personal identities and reducing their
concern for social
evaluation. This lack of restraint increases individual
sensitivity to the environment and lessens
rational forethought, which can lead
to antisocial behavior.”
It is of
urgent and immediate concern that society seems powerless to rein in herd psychology and it
has to be brought back from the pre civilized age of self destruction to a new age of dispassion, where to be
civilized is to refrain from intellectual, emotional and psychological
assault on our fellow human beings in word and action. We have to respect our
individuality which inter alia makes us individually responsible for others around
us. We have to affirm our identity so that we are wary of any aberration or
deviation from moral rectitude and disorder of thought and emotion. Last but
not the least we have to recognize the
oneness of humanity which we share with all others and cultivate self
restraint so that we do not overstep the norms that hold us together and constitute
the society as one of many and many of one.
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment