Monday 29 August 2016

A New Culture of Dissent against Counterculture.



                                       A New Culture of Dissent against Counterculture.
A recent Saturday supplement of a leading English daily  had a write-up on a Delhi based band Antariksh  formed by three young members who had given up their well paid corporate jobs to take to music as their profession. This is more common in the South where well qualified engineers, software professionals and even doctors have taken to Carnatic music as their preferred vocation.  The famous violin maestro L.Subramaniam who studied for medicine switched to music to create compositions in orchestral fusion which is a blend of Carnatic and Western music.  Antariksh band is the first among Rock bands whose three members, with an overriding passion for music have switched over from the corporate world to the creative world of performing arts.  The band, according to one of its members, attempts to produce modern, edgy and eclectic sounds which would resonate both with themselves as well as with the masses. The themes of their compositions are about emotions that we encounter in our daily lives- ‘emotions such as hope, greed, identity crisis, confusion – emotions that anyone in contemporary times can identify with. The band seeks to present a new sub genre to Hindi music, produced for, of and by modern generation. Coming from the corporate world, the trio turns up in formal dress as they believe it enhances their personality and stage presence and makes people take them seriously.
 It is this idea of formal dressing that distinguishes these young men from other music bands with their casual, rugged appearance which has almost become a signifier for anything modern. This fashion started in the  ‘50s and the  ‘60s of the last century heralding  the arrival of hippies who represented liberal counterculture in US and in UK and which later spread to Europe and other countries of the world. The hippie movement opposed all traditional mores of behavior, dressing, music and dance and preferred a return to  back-to- nature life style, vehemently denouncing all formal  and established values and advocating a culture of dissent that coincided with the early 20th century movement of “Make Everything New”. Hippie fashion and values had a major effect on culture, influencing popular music, television, film, literature, and the arts. Since the 1960s, many aspects of hippie culture have been assimilated by mainstream society and one of them is adopting a rugged, casual look that is a mockery of everything associated with elegance and being prim and proper in manners, dress and expression. To be free and not be stifled with social decorum and moral codes has been at the root of Hippyism.  Hippies of the post-‘50s of the 20th Century perceived the then prevalent culture as a corrupt, domineering entity that exercised undue power over their lives, and championed freedom and liberation from it. Hippie movement was basically a youth movement characterized by unconventional dress and behavior, opposition to war, advocating  peace and love, and having liberal attitudes towards sexuality, the use of marijuana and psychedelic drugs- in short  rebellion against any code or value  in the name of tradition,  which  can be best summed up as one of cultural dissent.
             The hippie movement has declined in the last few decades though  its legacy is seen in social protests such as the gay movement, the feminist movement, its adoption of live-in culture as opposed to marriage as a sanctified institution etc. The vestiges of the hippie movement can be seen today   in clothing and accessories, in personal appearance that distinctly oppose the well groomed types.  All music bands today play to frenzied crowds of young people, rock and psychedelic music, that has evolved into new musical genres such as heavy metal and rap music. The singers and composers on stage have rugged and shaggy appearances, dressed in informal and casual attires.  Today there is no sense of formal dressing (with the exception of corporate employees). We see students in colleges and universities seeking a distinct generational identity by putting on weird and bizarre clothes and sporting an unkempt look. As early as 1975, as a student in UK, I was shocked to see professors dressed most casually in shorts and unironed jeans and shirtsleeves and there was not much difference between the teacher and the taught in matters sartorial. Aping the West is a part of our genotype and I am not surprised to see the new sartorial get up of college teachers in faded and worn out jeans and unwashed wrap-ons, indistinguishable from that of the students. In many ways, it has eroded respect for the teachers as they are not taken seriously. Shakespeare’s line “the apparel oft proclaims the man” which in modern times is expressed as “the cloth makes the man”  is truer today than ever before.  Teachers want to look young and modern and prefer to merge with the young crowd with no distinct identity of their own. As a result, teachers have not been able to enforcestudents’ compliance to academic work and institutional regulations. They have become indistinct as one among a faceless crowd.  Group coherence is the blight of modernity.
A recent Harvard Study calls the approach to casualness as the red-sneaker effect practiced by a few who wear informality on the skin and violate the office dress code as one way of standing out among the conservative conformists to express their self-confidence, power and status. The  Harvard study cites the examples of Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates as successful tie-droppers who carried their intentional casualness with aplomb and self assurance. But the important question is how many Zuckerbergs and Bill Gates do we find among the casual dressers and how many  are there who go beyond casual wear and make casualness the pivot of achievement? The shaggy haired, unkempt looks in a bizarre outfit cannot make them Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg, as their style does not make any impactful statement. You cannot climb up the social and professional ladder only by casual wear. Substance can make the style, but not style, the substance.
Antariksh band is a revolution among music bands who have understood that too much of casualness in appearance trivializes serious import of any kind. The band in its formal elegance seems to go counter to the counter revolutionary culture that has now slowly waning to become a period fad. The consumer society is adding its might to beckon young men and women to splurge in elegant wear, well groomed looks, neat and tidy appearances and hopefullythis  will bring back a little more beauty and order in a world that had forgotten what it is to live life gracefully and tastefully.  Nostalgic? Maybe true, but therein lies the spark for change.

No comments:

Post a Comment